The article somewhat understates that this puts the trust zone back into the "user has to unlock" state but the device will be findable from binding to carrier on mobile, wifi or BT.
So it isn't entirely the same as "went to sleep" because the user-unlock of state is live in memory, in a sleep state. In this model, it's not because the user hasn't initiated the key unlock event with their ID
The article somewhat understates that this puts the trust zone back into the "user has to unlock" state but the device will be findable from binding to carrier on mobile, wifi or BT.
So it isn't entirely the same as "went to sleep" because the user-unlock of state is live in memory, in a sleep state. In this model, it's not because the user hasn't initiated the key unlock event with their ID